Oct 14 2008

Religulous

Category: Uncategorizedpodrey @ 5:01 pm

Lance and i went to see Religulous at the Galaxy Theater the night it opened. It promised to be a good movie, with my recent dealings with my family. Also, Bill Maher is just out and out hilarious. The Galaxy is one of my favorite theaters.

And it was a great movie. Not a documentary by any means. Does Michael Moore make documentaries? I think his films are often labeled such, though i would argue they are not “true” documentaries. Religulous is even less of a documentary than Moore’s films.

But it is interesting. Maher travels around the country and around the world, interviewing various religious leaders. About 40% of the film is focused on Christianity, and he then tackles Scientology, Mormanism, Islam, and Judaism. There were a lot of good jokes and poking fun at the various religions.

After watching it, i had to do some research. Maher had told the story of Horas, the son of Isis. If Maher’s depiction is true, then Horas existed a thousand years before Jesus and performed many of the same miracles, such as walking on water, being crucified and being raised from the dead. However, my research did not confirm or deny this story of Horas. There are conflicting accounts, and I could not find a good source to verify the story of Horas as Jesus. I also found that some of the quotes used, particularly of our founding fathers, were taken out of context.

Another factoid given is that 16 percent of the U.S. population is un-/non-/anti-religious, which is a larger segment than blacks (13%), gays (3%), or NRA members (2%). If that is true, i believe getting organized is in order! That is one of Maher’s messages near the end of the movie – a call to action.  Definitely a movie worth watching.

Speaking of getting organized, some people might be interested in this link regarding Kay Hagan’s bid for a NC Senate Seat. It all started when Elizabeth Dole issued a press release criticizing her opponent, Kay Hagan, for meeting with a group of law-abiding and responsible citizens, who happen to be non-believers. Be sure to read the comments of that post – that’s the best part! Readers of Friendly Atheist were so disgusted by Dole’s behavior that many of them, most of whom are out-of-state, have contributed money to Hagan’s campaign.

Since then, Dole has begun an outright smear campaign against Hagan, for being associated with and supported by web sites like “Friendly Atheist”. I guess Dole doesn’t think that everyone deserves representation. Vote for Kay Hagan in three weeks!

Tags: ,


Sep 20 2008

Into The Wild

Category: Uncategorizedpodrey @ 12:12 pm

Last night (Friday), lance & i went to the Museum of Art to watch one of their summer movies.  They have a great outdoor amphitheater.  The movie was Into The Wild.

Sean Penn directs a critically acclaimed adaptation of Jon Krakauer’s best-selling book based on the true story of a spirited, but emotionally wounded young man who seeks freedom, joy, and healing in the great Alaskan wilderness.

First of all, the environment was great.  It was a crisp fall evening.  The sky was clear.  The stars were shining.  We found a good spot near the front to put our chairs, and covered ourselves with the blanket we had brought.  Before the movie was over, we would be shivering a bit.

The movie intself was great.  Emile Hirsch did a wonderful job portraying the young man who rejected a “normal” life and became a drifter.  He graduated from college, had a graduation dinner with his parents, then burned his ID, took off from Atlanta and headed west, and didn’t tell anyone.  He named himself Alexander SuperTramp, and introduced himself that way to everyone he met.  When his car became undrivable somewhere in Arizona, he burned his remaining cash and started walking and hitchhiking.

Alex is in search of experiences, and he finds them.  He also encounters several interesting characters and forms unique and lasting bonds with them.  The film and the character do an amazing job reminding us that there is a wide world out there that is full of beauty.  Alex eventually decides that his path will lead him to the Alaskan wilderness, “the wild,” where he wants to live alone for awhile.

This journey is captivating.  I loved this movie.  I’m going to try in my life to mimic Alexander SuperTramp in at least small ways, and strive to have more experiences instead of just sitting on my butt.

Tags:


Sep 18 2008

The Last Temptation of Christ

Category: Uncategorizedpodrey @ 11:27 am

I watched this movie last night (sorry i watched it w/o you Lance, but really, you would have hated it). It’s been on my movie list for 12+ years, but it’s just not a movie i could ever get excited about. This is a Martin Scorsese film, even, but i never wanted to watch it. It was in my Netflix queue, and i guess we’re getting near the bottom of the barrel.

It’s basically the story of Jesus’ ministry, starting with his early internal conflicts about it and the decision to Go Forth and all that. It focuses on Jesus as a man, instead of Jesus as the Savior. We see the people following him, and the collecting of his disciples. We see some miracles and the cleansing of the temple. We see Jesus face temptations and overcome them. Until there is a final temptation as he is hanging on the cross. A “guardian angel” appears to him and gives him the opportunity NOT to die, but instead to go on living as a normal man, and raise a family. He succombs to this temptation, until the end of his life, when he realizes he should have died as God wanted him to. He prays, and God lets him go back and die on the cross as planned.

I did not particularly enjoy this movie. There are a few notable goods and bads:

Goods:

  • Jesus really is portrayed as a conflicted individual. He is a man struggling with what he thinks God wants for him. He is anxious. He has fear. He is uncertain. I like that Jesus is not a good and perfect person.
  • When Lazarus was raised from the dead, it was a very spooky “undead” moment. Lazarus looks to have partially decayed. It certainly put me in mind of vampires and other undead beings, whom Christians generally think of as evil. It also made me think of Aladdin and how the Genie can grant any wish, except 1) falling in love and 2) raising the dead. Raising the dead is something that generally has very negative associations and is something you’re not supposed to do. Why is it a “miracle” when Jesus did it instead of an abomination? Should he have done it in the first place? I just thought this film did a good job of subtley raising these questions, at least for me.
  • Judas is portrayed as a loyal and loving friend. I loved this, because i have long been a believer that Judas has gotten a bad rap. I do not think Judas betrayed Jesus in the normal sense of the word. Sure, i think Judas was the one that told the Romans where to find him, so yes he technically “betrayed” him. But i think Jesus told him to do it, and Judas didn’t want to, but did it out of love. Jesus KNEW he had to die. He knew he had to be a martyr in order for his message to endure. His friends did not want that. But Jesus entrusted the job to Judas, his best friend, because Judas knew what was at stake. At least, that’s been my take on it, and i was happy to see it played out on screen.
  • In the alternate life, when Jesus is a family man, he hears Paul preaching in the town square. Paul is telling of Jesus being crucified and then resurrected 3 days later. Jesus confronts him and says “I am Jesus, but i never died or rose again. You are lying.” Paul tells him it doesn’t matter what the actual truth is, he tells the truth as he wants it to be. And his made-up stories get people to believe in God. So he’s going to say whatever is necessary to get people converted. Well, well, isn’t THAT an interesting commentary on the church?

Bads:

  • Jesus is played by Willem Dafoe, who i know from Spiderman. I couldn’t help but envision the Green Goblin much of the time when Jesus was talking. Especially when he was talking to his disciple Peter. Quite unfortunate.
  • Jesus is not particularly likable. Why would anyone follow this tortured soul of a man? I always envisioned Jesus as a great orator and an inspiring person to be around. This Jesus was neither.
  • Jesus is not consistent. Sometimes he’s insecure and unsure of himself and what God wants, and sometimes he’s enraged and talking about himself in the first person as God.
  • There was an extremely bizarre part when Jesus comes out of the desert after fasting for 40 days and nights. He reaches INTO HIS CHEST and pulls out HIS BEATING HEART. I am not kidding. Just like in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. WTF?
  • The title of the movie is The Last Temptation of Christ, so i expected more of the movie to be devoted to that. But most of the movie is just about the life of Jesus. The last temptation piece only takes up about 20 minutes at the end.
  • There wasn’t any lightness in the movie, and it was hard to stay focused. Much of it was kind of boring in the beginning and middle parts. It didn’t REALLY catch my interest until the last temptation part started, near the end.

So anyway, i can’t say that i really recommend this movie, but i’m glad it’s finally crossed off my list. And there were a few interesting tidbits in it.

Tags: ,


Jul 25 2008

My Kid Could Paint That

Category: Uncategorizedpodrey @ 10:22 am

This film is the story of Marla, a 4-year old who was rose to fame in the art world for her abstract art. The paintings are discovered by a new gallery-owner, and he showcases Marla’s work. Her paintings start selling for thousands of dollars.

Marla seems like a normal child; her mother insists that’s exactly what she is. 60 Minutes agreed when they did their piece on her. But if Marla is just like any other child, then it calls into question what abstract art really is. Is something that is created by a child, who may or may not be talented, that doesn’t have cohesive thought behind it, worth that much money?

The 60 Minutes segment also drew another conclusion – that Marla’s paintings could not possibly be just hers. It implied that her father was directing her, and might even be putting finishing touches on her paintings. There were several attempts to prove them wrong – to show Marla’s efforts on video. But none of them were particularly convincing.

The film maker was very frank that every documentary is going to have some amount of the bias of the film maker. He did not believe that Marla was the sole creator of all the paintings, and his bias showed. However, for all his bias, he did leave it fairly open to interpretation. For me, though, that the conclusions he led us to make are pretty clear. His portrayal of the family was that a) mom truly believed in both the creativity and the normalcy of her child, b) dad was not genuine, c) mom & dad worked opposite shifts. To me, it looked like dad probably did help Marla when mom wasn’t around. But, i don’t think anyone on the outside will ever know for sure.

Most of Marla’s collectors have been satisfied, however, and her paintings continue to sell well.

An interesting story. Definitely recommended.

Tags:


Jul 11 2008

Orwell Rolls in his Grave

Category: Uncategorizedpodrey @ 10:02 pm

This film was extremely eye-opening.

The main point of the movie is that we, as a country, are being controlled by the media. Radio and television and music and Hollywood are all controlled by a handful of huge mega-corporations. This is not good.

There were a lot of good examples in the film of how we are being controlled. Yes, similar to how it is described in Orwell’s 1984. And similar to how Hitler’s propaganda strategist, Joseph Goebbels, manipulated the German public. Specifically, both scenarios begin with taking control of all sources of information. And that is what is happening in this country.

The internet is the sole remaining unobstructed source of information for us. And there are already proposals and debates about how and if to regulate or place controls on its use. The next decade will see attempts to control it, and us.

I found a new hatred for Bush while watching this movie, as well. 5.6 more months…

This is a must-see film. We’ve checked out a bunch of books from the library on similar topics, too, and i plan to review them here eventually.

Tags: , ,


Jun 04 2008

Sex & The City: The Movie

Category: Uncategorizedpodrey @ 4:35 pm

Tuesday night at North Hills.  Met Tonia for dinner & drinks beforehand.  Lots of classy-looking ladies around, and we figured many of them would be joining us for the movie.

We finished our drinks and entered the theater in the nick of time, just as the previews were starting.  We walked down the hallway, turned the corner, and found ourselves faced with a full theater.  There were not two seats together anywhere in the stadium-seating area.  So, we turned our attention the section way down front, and found that the only space available was on the very front row.  We snagged two seats in the exact middle.

The fun thing about being on the front row was looking behind us at everyone in the theater, and counting the men.  There were exactly FIVE men in the whole theater.  And remember, the theater was FULL.  250+ capacity.  That’s a lotta ladies!  And many of them were dressed up in fancy labels.  We saw a few girls at the bar pre-movie drinking Cosmopolitans.  I loved the aura of the whole experience..  I was surprised, though, that it was a sell-out movie on a Tuesday. 

The front row where we’ve been forced to sit is too close to the screen.  We spent the entire movie pushing backward to try to see more, and having to move our heads from side to side to see what was happening on the entire screen.

The movie itself was entertaining.  All the familiar faces are back, albeit a bit older.  The movie was good.  Fairly predictable, but fun.  The series was better.  Still, it was nice to revisit them.  I hate that Stanford isn’t with Marcus anymore, and hate even more who he ended up with.  I don’t like the part where Carrie blames Miranda’s comment for Big’s behavior — it was a pretty thin excuse for their longest ever fight.  But, the rest was fun and entertaining – i liked seeing how their lives ended up.  

I’m going to see it again next week with another friend, and i hope to get better seats this time!

Tags: ,


May 30 2008

P.S. I Love You

Category: Uncategorizedpodrey @ 4:38 pm

Hillary Swank is not sexy enough for her lips.

PS I Love You is about a woman whose dead husband sends her letters for a year after his death. He had a brain tumor so he knew he was going to die, and he prepared all this in advance.

In general, i like a movie that will make me cry. And i did cry a few times. But i can’t say i liked this movie very much. I didn’t like many of the characters. The dead husband was the most likable one, and he wasn’t around much.

It was too depressing. The substance of the movie was obviously depressing – you have a woman who is grieving b/c the love of her life died and she’s having trouble adjusting. But the movie tries to also have the typical elements of a “chic flick” with comic relief and lightheartedness. They just don’t mesh well with death and grief looming over them.

There are lots of other movies that make me cry and i just love them. Titanic makes me bawl every time. I’m not sure i’ve explained well why i don’t love this one. But i don’t.

Tags:


Mar 31 2008

21 – movie review

Category: Uncategorizedpodrey @ 4:51 pm

21 is a the movie version of the book Bringing Down the House by Ben Mezrich.  I read it last year and wrote a short review in this blog.  It was an extremely fun and fast-paced book.

The movie was also fun.  But it wasn’t as gripping.  Or believable.  Remember, the book was based on a true story.  The movie changed some of the main plot lines to accomodate the “hollywood angles,” and it really lost some of its appeal.  For example, the casino basement scenes with people getting beaten up??  That doesn’t happen.  And they are simply not allowed to physically detain you – if they suspect you of counting cards, they can ask you to leave and that’s it.

I also found myself confused at the end.  Did the team make a bunch of money on that last night or not?  Was it all stolen, or had they properly accounted for variable change?

Also, it would have been more realistic to show them actually losing some big hands sometimes.  Just because you count cards, doesn’t mean you’re not going to lose a lot of money sometimes.  The edge they were working with was still pretty small – not big enough to guarantee you’ll win every hand.  But i guess that would be too confusing for the general populace

All in all, it was an enjoyable movie, though.  Kevin Spacy was awesome, though i would expect no less.

One other thing – i was intrigued to see the Monty Hall problem presented early in the movie.  Here it is:

You’re on the gameshow Let’s Make a Deal and are present with 3 doors.  You’re told behind one is a brand new car, and behind the other two are goats.  You choose a door, say Door A.  Monty (who knows which door the car is behind) then reveals what is behind Door C – a goat.  And he says to you, i’ll give you a chance to switch your choice to Door B.   Do you switch?It’s a fascinating problem if only because so many people get it wrong.

 

Tags: ,


Feb 17 2008

Heavenly Creatures

Category: Uncategorizedpodrey @ 6:11 pm

This started out being a movie review of Heavenly Creatures, which i have wanted to watch for a long time because it was directed by Peter Jackson.  (He also did Lord of the Rings.)  But, it has morphed into something else.  A tale from my own childhood also follows.

Going into it, i didn’t know what the movie was about, although i did have a vague notion that it contained lesbians.  And i associate Peter Jackson with fantasy.  So i thought it would be some combination of those two concepts.

Heavenly Creatures is about two girls and their close relationship.  Sexual intimacy between them was insinuated, but there was nothing graphic.  And there was fantasy, but nothing sexual.  The fantasy was the fantasy of their combined imaginations.  They made up worlds and people and afterlifes.  They role-played and had imaginary names for themselves.  They eventually became obsessed with each other.  Their parents became concerned and strove to separate them.  Their panic at being separated drove them to concoct a plan to murder one of their mothers.  With her out of the way, they thought they could be together forever.

I was quite surprised as the ending credits rolled that this was based on a true story.  They were caught and convicted of the murder they perpetrated.

This movie touched me a bit, and i have been thinking about it all day.  Peter Jackson indeed did an excellent job.  I sympathized with them!  The agony they each felt at being separated was clearly captured.  And i identified with it.

I identified with it because i also was involved in an obsessive relationship at that age.  14 years old is a time of figuring out who you are and becoming separate from your parents and their routine.  Of starting to rebel and identify who you are.  Except, you have no boundaries and no experience and no context.  And it is surprisingly easy to lose yourself in someone.

When i was 14, i fell in love for the first time.  His name was Sonny.  He was my brother’s best friend, and i had had a crush on him for years.  When he finally noticed me and we began to hang out, i had never been so happy.  With the innocence of youth, we gave our hearts to each other completely.  We both felt that there was nothing more important in the world than each other.

Our parents didn’t get it though, and rarely let us see each other.  We went to different schools, and Sonny was often grounded.  Our relationship was conducted largely by phone.  When he was grounded from the phone, we wrote letters to each other.

Our relationship was serious in our eyes, and since our parents did not understand and would not allow us to see each other more frequently, we came up with our own solution.  Sonny only lived 7 miles away from me, and he had a bike.  So, in the dead of night after everyone was asleep, he rode his bike to my house.  My window was ground level, so it was easy to get inside.  I thought it was terribly romantic of him to bike all that way (7 miles seemed so great a distance to me) in defiance of parental tyranny.

The first of these nights, we had been “going together” for about 6 months and still hadn’t had our first kiss.  And we were both nervous and shy, and it took at least an hour for us to get around to that kiss after he crawled into my room that first night.

We were both innocent, and remained so.  I don’t think either of us really knew what sex was at the time.  It was certainly never a danger during the handful of secret rendezvous we had.  If it had continued much longer… it’s hard to say.  Of note, those secret liaisons brought us much closer emotionally.  First of all, we shared a big secret.  Secondly, it was unsupervised time together – if we did not do anything particularly sexual, there was still a lot of kissing and hugging that isn’t appropriate for 14-year olds.

But then, of course, we were discovered.  And separated.  And not allowed to communicate in any way for 15 months.  Letters were intercepted.  Phone calls were screened.  No contact was allowed, and soon we stopped trying.  It was awful.  I was devastated and depressed for quite some time.  I wrote stories about us running away together.

Heavenly Creatures reminded me of that period of depression.  It seemed most cruel to separate me from my true love, and the way the girls in the movie felt was portrayed very similarly.  They went one step further than i did, though – they formed a plan involving murder, and executed it.  It was a disturbing movie.

It’s disturbing in a large part because it has made me revisit this time in my life and i don’t think i was that far away from being as crazy as the two girls ended up being.  So, in that light, I can’t say i disagree with the decision to separate us.  It was extremely traumatic to me at the time, but it was probably pretty unhealthy to have such a strong attachment at that young of an age.  I still blame both sets of parents for not accomodating us a little more.  The relationship might have progressed more normally in a properly supervised environment if they had just let us see each other a little more frequently.

To finish the story, when we were 16, Sonny and i did become reaquainted.  But we had both changed.  The innocence and romance were gone.  He had acquired some brutish attitudes, and certainly didn’t think it was cool to be in love.  I had acquired some cynacism and skepticism.  We did try half-heartedly, but i think we were both disappointed.  It just wasn’t the same.  We decided to be friends, but only kept in touch sporadically after that.

About six months later, Sonny committed suicide.

Tags: , , ,


Jan 21 2008

Juno

Category: Uncategorizedpodrey @ 6:12 pm

occassionally, lance will say to me “want to go see a movie tonight?”  the answer is always yes.  to this date, he’s never picked a bad movie.  he likes indie films, so when i ask “what movie?” i usually haven’t heard of it.  that was the case last night with juno.  he usually doesn’t tell me anything about the movie, either.  there’s something utterly delightful about going into a movie, knowing it will be good, but not knowing anything about it.

the basic story is a 16-year old girl, juno, gets pregnant by having sex with her best friend.  juno makes a choice to give her baby to an affluent adoptive couple she finds in the classifieds.  the story explores the relationships juno has with her parents, the boyfriend, and the perfect adoptive couple (who turn out to be not-so-perfect) while her pregnancy progresses.

there are so many things to like about this movie.  the main character, juno, is portrayed very well by ellen page as a quick-witted, sharp-tongued, eccentric high school teen.  the story couldn’t have been told well without her.  the rest of the cast also performs well.  my favorite supporting character is the stepmom (allison janney).  she is refreshingly not your run-of-the-mill-slightly-evil-stepmother.  she has a great scene with the ultrasound technician that leaves you with open-mouthed, wide-eyed laughter.

that’s another thing – this movie was funny.  we had kind of a dud crowd – we seemed to be the only ones laughing.  yes, this is a movie about teenage pregnancy, but come on, people!  tons of great lines – at the first meeting with the adoptive parents, juno says “if I could just have the thing and give it to you now, i totally would. but i’m guessing it looks probably like a sea monkey right now and we should let it get a little, you know, cuter.”  and then as they’re leaving, the dad says to the parents “thanks for having me and my irresponsible child over your house.”  funny, subtle, sarcastic stuff – it’s great.

in the end, though, it leaves you feeling good, with a smile on your face.  things didn’t work out quite the way we wanted them to, but they work out just the same.

definite thumbs up – highly recommended.

oh and lance, as boyfriends go, you are totally boss.  you are the cheese to my macaroni. 

Tags:


« Previous PageNext Page »